bovil: (Default)
[personal profile] bovil
No, you're not getting the play-by-play. The internet wasn't free in the hotel this year, and I didn't feel like paying for service, so there was no liveblogging.

We'll start with the ugly, just to get it out of the way.

Having 425 seats for the masquerade last year was ugly. Having less than half of that this year was worse. Having the house open over 45 minutes late was bad. Not having any risers so nobody behind the first 5 rows could really see anything was ugly. Yes, I know there are reasons that the space wasn't larger and there wasn't a stage. It doesn't change the problems.

That's the only real ugly. The rest of the flaws were just bad.

The room layouts in the hotel were suboptimal for parties, fanzine lounge and consuite. Nothing that can really be done about this, except maybe finding a new home for consuite and/or fanzine lounge in the future.

There was almost no hanging space in the hotel rooms, just an alcove with a hanger rod.

The Dealers' room was less than thrilling. There were some good dealers in there, but space allocation could have been handled better.

Closing reg at 9:00pm on Friday night when the party floor is badged is a nuisance. Some folks can't come to the con until after work, and in some cases "after work" is in another county or fairly late at night. We had several folks who just couldn't get to Santa Clara until well after that. It was explained that this happened because reg wasn't allowed to have more staff to stay open later, and that's a failure of the BayCon staffing model.

The fire alarm on Friday night that only went off on some floors and proceeded to leave much of the convention and hotel staff confused about what happened and when it actually ended was a nuisance.

Having the only upper-story path between the convention center and the hotel pass through the break-out rooms being used by the Northern California Catholic Charismatic Conference was not good. Granted, BayCon was only using ground-level space at the convention center, but I know a lot of people tried at least once to get to it via the second-floor hotel connection or the parking structure bridge.

That said, there weren't that many other problems that impacted us directly.

The good?

This is the first BayCon I've been to in years where there was no lack of parking. Our room overlooked the parking garage, and I could always see at least a few spaces available on the top level.

Function space in the Hyatt and ballroom space in the convention center was all pretty good. Public spaces (the bar, restaurant and patios) were really nice, and if the weather was in the high 70's to low 80's would be even better.

One would think being in a tower with only 4 elevators and no sleeping rooms below 3rd floor would be horrific, but elevator congestion was manageable. That was actually good.

With the exception of a bad waiter or two in the bar and the restaurant, all the hotel staff was fantastic, friendly and cheerful.

The 'zine was good. The program book took a series of what could have been horrible design choices and made them work. The design was attractive and readability was OK.

Program green room was calm, quiet and nicely stocked (even if you had to ask someone to fetch you a cold soda or water). Program ops was well-organized. Ops was well-organized.

The consuite was, even in cramped space, absolutely gorgeous. Best decorating job in years.

Art show was pretty nice.

Fanzine lounge was a blast.

Parties were excellent and plentiful. Our last outing as party landlords went really well. The last [livejournal.com profile] loeg party is over. The A.C.R.O.N.Y.M. Harem party was fantastic, and the [livejournal.com profile] furcon party on Sunday was fabulous.

Date: 2008-05-28 05:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] genuine-snark.livejournal.com
The internet was arranged to be free, for roomholders. The T-Mobile charges were supposed to be forgiven off your bill. I had that straight from Hotel division.

BayCon did manage to leave that off the "cheat sheet" and the hotel also apparently failed to deduct the charges (mine showed up on my bill). I ended up getting mine deducted from the final bill via Con Ops.

Date: 2008-05-28 05:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kproche.livejournal.com
Well, then, free Internet that no one is told about isn't a whole lot of good, is it?

Sheesh.

Plus the fact that T-mobile can't seem to maintain my user info from daypass to daypass, and gripes when I try to create a new account with the old email address.

Date: 2008-05-28 05:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bovil.livejournal.com
There was never a "$0.00" option on the Hyatt wired network subscription page, at least not in my rooms, nor was there in the fanzine lounge (which was a big disappointment).

So not letting anybody know (and I talked to Christian about this on Thursday and Friday, at which point he didn't know) that the charges would be cleared from the final bill was a major communication failure.

Date: 2008-05-28 07:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] genuine-snark.livejournal.com
I hear you.

I was told anecdotally (but again, from a Hotel division source) on Friday night. When I got the checkout invoice, I had wireless charges on the bill. I went back to the cheat sheet to find the "free" line and couldn't--it wasn't mentioned in writing.

So, I checked back with Con Ops, left my receipt, and the charges were removed. I then verified that it was supposed to be free, so I don't think it was just a "miscommunication" gimme.

I don't know why it wasn't on the cheat sheet. It's possible they were (mistakenly) relying on a $0 option being available on the hotel network signup.

Date: 2008-05-28 06:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johno.livejournal.com
How/When was this communicated?

Date: 2008-05-28 07:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] genuine-snark.livejournal.com
To me, anecdotally, but Con Ops backed it at the end of the con and the charges were removed.

It's a definite shame it wasn't communicated clearly. My understanding was that there was supposed to be a $0.00 choice on the wireless signup, but it didn't come through.

Date: 2008-05-28 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nohwhere-man.livejournal.com
The first day I asked about Internet usage at the front desk. The clerk told me straight away that it's free, to sigh up as "bill to room" and that the charges would be taken of by management in the mornings. While the latter didn't happen for the "final" bill, which is printed at 3am or some such, the front desk removed the charges immediately when this was pointed out. Either way, none of this was communicated to the attendees.

Regards a $0.00 option- when the system is managed by another profit-making company (t-mobile, in this case), getting them to add a zero-cost option is not going to happen. Esp as the no-cost option was between the hotel and baycon, not with t-mobile.

While I didn't try it, I was told that the wire-line Internet was Hyatt-operated. That may have had a no-cost option.

None of this mitigates the fact that not only does t-mobile generally suck, there were times when the packet loss was so great that I couldn't even pull up the login page. They also -seemed- to be filtering my vpn, but since -I- couldn't tell the tech support people which ports it uses, -they- couldn't see if it was blocked. Since I use Checkpoint VPN-1, one of the most common systems (and IIRC it's IPSEC, to boot) and they too had google, I find the lack of service appalling. If I'd had to pay for the service I'd have been asking for credits.

Date: 2008-05-28 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kevin-standlee.livejournal.com
I was staying in a Hyatt as well -- Columbus OH, for MARcon -- and they also have T-Mobile as the pay-to-play internet provider. I went ahead and paid for it, and they also did not support my VPN (Cisco). I didn't need the VPN access critically enough to deal with tech support about it, especially as I expected it would be difficult to impossible to resolve, as you found.

Date: 2008-05-28 05:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rmjwell.livejournal.com
The hotel rooms had lots of non-functional decor (such as the mile wide faux cabinet to put the TV on and the retro-futuristic chair and ottoman that weren't on rollers) that didn't impress me, but the bed was very comfortable.

The restaurant did their best and didn't seem to suck, which for their first time is a positive.

I'm not a masquerade attendee and even I was shocked at the seating plans for that event. And Baycon has a large costuming component so I was surprised at the decision.

The Trailer Park was incredibly lame and no amount of [livejournal.com profile] johnnyeponymous vamping could cover for it.

Date: 2008-05-28 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bovil.livejournal.com
Trailer Park ran when I was working on our hoax-zine (and drinking and playing cards in the bar). I would, however, likely have found some other thing to fill that time; I've really lost interest in that panel.

Date: 2008-05-28 06:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iamradar.livejournal.com
I spoke to the Masquerade Directors and they were just as mad about the room size- the reason the stage was not up on risers was because they would have lost several rows of seats in a room that only seated about 180 to start with.

Date: 2008-05-28 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shipofools999.livejournal.com
There was a Trailer Park snaffo that was completely independent of Baycon this year and it would have been canceled. Baycon staffers pulled what they could together to get something to show. This problem should not happen again.

Date: 2008-05-28 06:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johno.livejournal.com
Signage

New space and no signs to point the way to the dealers room, art show, large events. Gaming was well placed to be noticed, but it didn't have any standing signs either.

Date: 2008-05-29 05:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bovil.livejournal.com
Yes. Better signage would have been a real boon, particularly with the facility being unfamiliar to many attendees.

Date: 2008-05-29 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nitroace.livejournal.com
I think there were issues with the hotel on where we could put up signs. They were being picky as I understand.

Date: 2008-05-28 07:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] karisu-sama.livejournal.com
Fanime in that location always held its Masquerade in the convention center - and what sort of passed for a Hospitality suite was there as well.

Date: 2008-05-28 08:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iamradar.livejournal.com
I also saw a picture on the map that they have a Real Theater there as well...although I don't know if BayCon's willing to fork over the cash for the use of it for Masquerade.

Date: 2008-05-29 05:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bovil.livejournal.com
They know, [livejournal.com profile] smashwolf toured it on Monday and said it's fabu, and they just might fork over the cash for Saturday only after this mess.

Date: 2008-05-29 05:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] iamradar.livejournal.com
...That would be fabulous, to have Masquerade in a venue that is well-appreciated by competitors and viewers alike!

Date: 2008-05-28 07:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dinogrl.livejournal.com
I have to agree with most of your assessment. I found one bartender very grumpy about having to change the channel on Sunday for the "shuttle mission". (Yeah, that told you how informed he was.) He wasn't happy that he had to miss the play by play of the Indy 500 after show. Otherwise the hotel staff was extremely nice and really went the extra mile for your comfort.
The dealers' room was a mess. Costumers in front of costumers, not nearly enough book vendors, and more than a few empty spaces. I heard a few of them left after a day of no sales, and many book dealers were not allowed in until they offered them space one week out, and then it was too late. My situation really sucked from the perspective of having to explain why I wasn't in the dealers' room to many anxious fans who are customers, when that is my only real local area convention. I wasn't in a position to give them a reason, just speculation. You don't mess with a major overhaul (or was that a "new mix"??) of dealers when many fans count on those vendors to be there with "lists" in hand of what they have been saving up for a year to buy. I was lead to the function space by someone who had been there before, as it wasn't well marked, and was surprised to see how tomb-like the dealers' function space was. It was actually a blessing to not deal this year and look at things from a more relaxed perspective. Sure it will hurt in the financial side, but it was actually nice to attend the social side of the convention. My hope is that someone actually listened to concerns (if they were voiced), and does something positive to correct those situations.

Date: 2008-05-28 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nohwhere-man.livejournal.com
Tomb like? Maybe Friday morning. I know saturday and sunday it was pretty well bustling, since I was in and out of the art show all the time. I was told by other staffers that they had -way- more costume-related vendors apply than could reasonable accept, and they certainly seemed to have more than past years. As for dealers leaving early, I suppose there were a couple of empty spots, but why? Did those dealers leave Friday, which would be IMHO stupid, or did they decide to pull out? And if someone pulled on the week before, what should the dealer's room manager do? Not offer the space to someone else?

That aside, they do try to balance how many of which sort of dealers are in the room, so there aren't all booksellers and no DVDs/etc.

You have sent your concerns to baycon, haven't you?

Date: 2008-05-28 03:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] baronlaw.livejournal.com
What is the contact address for concerns regarding this past BayCon?

Date: 2008-05-28 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nohwhere-man.livejournal.com
See http://baycon.org/2008/contact.html or the baycon LJ community. (I'm not speaking for baycon.)

Date: 2008-05-28 08:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dinogrl.livejournal.com
Tomb-like as in no windows, or light wall space. It felt like the inside of a tomb in those terms. And yes, I was one of the dealers snubbed by the coordinator. We repeatedly emailed to offer our availability when they were offering a third table to others that already were in. No response. Juried is another word for "who I like and dislike", not what is best for the convention.

Date: 2008-05-28 05:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cmdrsuzdal.livejournal.com
I liked the rooms fine, partly since I'm used to tiny rooms in certain other cons and think of the Doubletree as the exception. The long TV counter worked for me and all my crap and the rod/open closet was helpful since I could see what I had-although not having a top shelf was weird. Ditto the sinks had plus and minuses.

I liked the hotel layout, but that's probably because I was on the 3rd floor so I could use the pool elevator. The modularity does mean that it's less likely to pass one area of programming space on the way to another which is a shame. But the Coffee Garden Replacement Zones are excellent and I look forward to being at the hotel when it's warm enough to enjoy the outdoors. I liked the food better.

The party floor suffered from small rooms, non-removed beds and narrow hallways. Buuut... I noticed that instead of the Doubletree tendency of everyone ending up in one or two places (like the balcony) this seems to have lead to more traffic in each party since people kept moving. Things seemed livelier in some ways.

The fanzine lounge could have had a better space, but a) it's had worse, and b) it probably fitted more people more comfortably that the party rooms ;)

The staff was awesome. The restaurant staff was mostly awesome.

The art show room was muuuuuuuch better. There were new-to-Baycon artists on display.

The dealer's room seemed fine to me, I spent more than in past years and found what I was looking for. There were at least four bookdealers that I saw, two new and two used. There were some nice new-to-Baycon dealers I think.

Date: 2008-05-29 03:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] supersniffles.livejournal.com
It was explained that this happened because reg wasn't allowed to have more staff to stay open later, and that's a failure of the BayCon staffing model.
There was a misunderstanding here somewhere; We would have been allowed more staff, we couldn't find more staff.

Date: 2008-05-29 04:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bovil.livejournal.com
This is what was related to me.

Mind you, I understand communication errors, and I so understand having difficulty recruiting staff.

Date: 2008-05-30 02:21 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] supersniffles.livejournal.com
I know that we went into con at least 2 people short in Reg and then we lost one at con. That's why I was in there so much. I was actually Admin Manager this year, not Reg Head.

Date: 2008-05-30 02:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] supersniffles.livejournal.com
Though it's true that we didn't originally plan on staying open past 9pm. When we realized that we should, we didn't have the staff to implement it.
It'll be better next year. Really.

Date: 2008-05-30 09:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bovil.livejournal.com
We're not running a party next year, so it's less of a real problem for us, but I'm going to make sure that I clearly communicate to friends who aren't taking Friday off work that they've got to be at reg by X:XX time.

Profile

bovil: (Default)
Andrew T Trembley

June 2011

S M T W T F S
    1 2 34
5 6 7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 04:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios