bovil: (Default)
Originally posted by [livejournal.com profile] ladyqkat at Dear GOP - the collective you are an Idiot
(Post originally seen in this post by [info]ramblin_phyl. I have been notified that it was originally posted by [info]suricattus in her journal post. The story and words are hers, but I do believe that it needs to go viral and that as many people as possible need to get their stories out there. Only by making a noise about this can we make a change in our society.)

There is a move afoot in the nation -driven by the GOP - to repeal the new health care laws, to protect corporate interests, to defend against fear-mongering (and stupid) cries of "socialism!", and to ensure that people are forced to choose between keeping a roof over their heads or getting necessary health care.

This movement is killing people.

Think I'm overstating the fact?

Ask the friends and family of writer/reviewer Melissa Mia Hall, who died of a heart attack last week because she was so terrified of medical bills, she didn't go see a doctor who could have saved her life.

From another writer friend: One person. Not the only one. That could have been me. Yeah, I have access to insurance -- I live in New York City, which is freelancer-friendly, and have access to freelancer advocacy groups. Through them, I can pay over $400/month ($5,760/year) as a single, healthy woman, so that if I go to the hospital I'm not driven to bankruptcy. But a doctor's appointment - a routine physical - can still cost me several hundred dollars each visit. So unless something's terribly wrong? I won't go.

My husband worked for the government for 30 years. We have government employee (retired) insurance. It is the only thing of value he took away from that job. His pension is pitiful. He still works part time. My writing income has diminished drastically. Our combined income is now less than what it was before T retired fifteen years ago. Inflation has diminished it further. In the last 30 days I have racked up over $8000 in medical bills for tests and the beginning of treatment. Our co-pay is 20% after the deductible. And there is more to come. Our savings are already gone. I have the gold standard of insurance and I still can't pay all the medical bills.

Another friend lost her insurance when her husband lost his job. She couldn't afford medication and ended up bed ridden for three months at the end of over a year of no job and therefore no insurance until he found work again.

It's our responsibility. All of us, together. As a nation.

EtA: Nobody is trying to put insurance companies out of business. They will always be able to offer a better plan for a premium. We simply want to ensure that every citizen - from infant to senior citizen - doesn't have to choose between medical care, and keeping a roof over their heads, or having enough to eat.

We're trying to get this to go viral. Pass it along.




I'm going to post my story as the first comment to this post if anyone would like to read it. If anyone wants to tell their story, please tell it on your own journal and post a link in the comments. Maybe, just maybe, TPTB will listen to the slaves peons who clean their toilets before they have to clean their own.

_DSC1226

Jan. 22nd, 2011 01:00 pm
bovil: (Default)

_DSC1226
Originally uploaded by bovil

I didn't shoot a lot at FurtherConfusion 2011, but I got a few good pics. The whole set is up on flickr.

bovil: (Default)
I'm absolutely thrilled with what I can do with the Photoflex StarLite and large LightDome (softbox).

I have to get a new monitor for the computer. The one I've got is a flat panel, but it's a really old flat panel and the contrast is crap. If I dial up the brightness so the whites are white, the blacks start getting wimpy. If I dial down the brightness to get black blacks, it's not bright enough to be useful. This makes doing much fine exposure adjustment of raw images on the screen a bit iffy. Not impossible, just too dependent on clipping warnings and such.

It may be possible for me to like the new printer more than I do, but I doubt it, and the result would likely be unnatural.

Ventures

Jan. 6th, 2011 10:12 pm
bovil: (Default)
I'm going to attempt to use the new Photoflex strobe and 3x4' softbox for PenWAG on Saturday.

On the smart side, I've set up and disassembled the softbox itself twice this evening. It's a little, well, I can't say futzy, because futzy doesn't really describe springing 4 heavy fiberglass rods into an aluminum mounting rig. Once I sorted out which holes not to use (this is the mounting ring for the 7' octagonal softbox, and it's got a few threaded holes that I need to avoid) it turned out to be manageable. Packaging it back up is a bit more of a nuisance. It doesn't just collapse down into a sensible compact form like an umbrella does. That's a lot of material to wrap around just 4 (removable) rods.

I haven't tried actually using the head yet. I have tested it to make sure it works and installed the modeling light. I will need a few extra test shots to dial in the exposure. I expect I'm going to be using a much tighter aperture with the lumens this thing puts out. I'm also going to have to get used to full-manual no-remote-control optical trigger lighting.

Nobody ever said it would be easy...
bovil: (Default)
I've got two that are reasonably achievable.

I'm going to recover from the fall's missing gym visits. Some of them were triggered by bad sleeping habits (which I'm getting away from). Some were triggered by work project madness (which should be getting more manageable). But I'm going to get back up to an hour on the treadmill on my cardio days, and back to over 6 miles per session.

I'm going to print more photos. Specifically, I'm going to print at least one photo a week and I'm going to print at least one new photo from every session. I'm still a bit off on my exposures (both auto and manual) and while the pics look OK on the screen, they're often shown to be underexposed when it comes to print. I need to see what the pictures look like printed. I need to get a better feel for what good exposures should look like on the histogram. Raw files allow for a bit of exposure latitude and avoid loss of detail in the highlights and shadows, but I want to have to do less correction. Better photos in the camera mean better photos on the web and in the prints with less work (and I'm by no means the kind of person who likes to spend hours in Lightroom or Photoshop doing major post-production).
bovil: (Default)

(if you're not seeing the embedded video, watch it on YouTube)

bovil: (Default)
Based on comments from others, I've added two Zojirushi rice cookers to the list of possiblities:

The NS-LAC05 is a 3-cup cooker with a bucket of features.

The NP-GBC05 is the induction-heating version of the above cooker.

Yes, the brown rice feature is important to me, which is why I've been sticking with logic-controlled units.
bovil: (Default)
We're going to replace the current steamer we use as a rice cooker with an actual rice cooker. So far we've only checked Fry's and Costco. I need to get out to some of the Asian grocery stores.

I was figuring on a computer-controlled ("fuzzy logic" "neuro fuzzy" or other goofy brand name) cool-touch style cooker.

We looked at Zojirushi. They're really cool, but they're also expensive. Right out.

Our Costco has the Aroma Professional Series 20-Cup Sensor Logic Rice Cooker for $30. That's a bargain, and the feature set is interesting, but it's also twice the capacity that we're looking for (its dry rice capacity is 10 cups, the rest we're looking at are 5.5 cup models).

Costco online has the Tiger JAG-B10U 5.5 cup rice cooker for $90. It doesn't have the slow-cooker features of the Aroma, but it does have a "scorched rice" cycle.

Fry's has the Panasonic SR-DE102 5.5 cup rice cooker for $85. It looks comparable to the Tiger and includes a steamer basket, but Panasonic doesn't make their rice cooker manuals available online, so it's hard to tell.

Any rice-cooker geeks out there with opinions?
bovil: (Default)
We've got two old printers taking up space. If you want them, and you can pick them up, they're yours.

Canon S450


This is a standard inkjet printer, probably about 8 years old. We printed a bunch of the Costume-Con 26 fliers on it before we got the Phaser 560 (now dead). It includes a BCI-32e photo print head (that can be swapped for the black print head). The standard color print head is borked and color output is way off, but the print head is user-replaceable. If you buy a BCI-31e print head cartridge and swap it in, it will be just fine. Print heads can be cleaned with windex, of all things (and they probably need cleaning).

Canon i9900


This is a 13" carriage medium-format dye-ink photo printer. We printed the 11x17" Evil Genius Hall of Fame posters on it. It needs some TLC to get it back up and running, but is salvageable. It includes an extra print head, a set of nearly-full cleaning cartridges, a bulk ink system and a bunch of Lyson Photonic ink for the bulk ink system. There are three paths to get it back in operation: I liked the i9900, I liked the color range and colorfastness of the Photonic inks (and had no problems dealing with ICC profiles), but the bulk ink system was more maintenance-intensive than I really wanted to deal with. It's one of the last printers to use the BCI-6 ink cartridge (no chips in the cartridge), so it's very refill-friendly.
bovil: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] jadecat9 and I went to Watsonville on Saturday morning for the Photoflex factory outlet sale.

This was not without hitches. After she came down to SJ to meet me, we found my car wouldn't start, it had a flat battery, so we were stuck doing the trip in her Mini (pleasant, but cramped once filled with cargo).

Still, we got breakfast and got to Watsonville by 9:15.

After only 15 minutes, the sale was already incredibly picked-over. A bunch of my shopping list was out the window.

Still, there was a 300w-s flash kit for $160, so I grabbed it. It had a small softbox, but it was a flash kit. There were large softboxes that hadn't been scarfed up yet.

Then I decided to go back and look at one of the big cases with only a tag, no flier taped to it. Turns out it was a 650w-s StarFlash kit for $220, and it included a large (7' diameter) "Octodome" softbox. Skipped the smaller kit. [livejournal.com profile] ladycelia asked "Where are you going to set up a 7' Octodome?" Doesn't really matter, it's a $450 flash before the lightstand, softbox adapter and Octodome are added in. It's a $800 kit at Adorama.

I also picked up a large (4' x 3') rectangular "Lightdome" softbox and louvers for $25. They also had spare modeling lights for $3.

I should have asked about reflectors; the kit didn't include reflectors for use with umbrellas (which I already have) or just bare. Fortunately, they're pretty cheap, even at retail prices.

Fitting the case (and Jade's case of stuff) in the Mini was a bit tricky, but it did fit.

We also checked out Orion Telescopes next door, but their outlet sale prices weren't as fantastic.

Barring unforeseen craziness next year, I have to get back and pick up some more ultra-cheap light modifiers. Small and medium softboxes. Maybe a compact fluorescent continuous lighting kit for the times I can't use (or am setting up so others who can't use flash can still use the light).
bovil: (Default)
My tags are lost, but I don't really care. Anyway, on to SMOFcon...

We went in to SMOFcon with minimal responsibilities: Organize the distillery tour for Thursday, turn over excess WFC 2009 supplies still in our hands to SMOFcon.

Both went well. We had 15 tour participants, spent 3 hours at the distillery, and had a great time. Several cases of supplies were turned over to SMOFcon hospitality.

The rest of the weekend?

Thursday night we met up with a bunch of folks in hospitality.

On Friday we hung out with folks in hospitality, mostly. We peeked in at the "Bid Boot Camp" mega-panel. The notes on the board for the portion we missed were interesting, but the discussion going on when we went in was a bit odd. People were arguing that if you didn't sell pre-supports/memberships during your party, you weren't getting anything out of it. Yeah. Not so much. We also went over to Singlebarrel (on the back side of the block) for a cocktail; between 5pm and 6pm you can get a Ramos Gin Fizz there (we did, they were fantastic).

Friday night was the "Open Space Programming Mixer" (though we referred to it as "Open Source Programming Mixer"). The idea was to generate the convention's program during the mixer, but it was logistically challenged. The major pitfalls were:
  • One program track should have been scheduled in advance, because all open-source resulted in no prep time and no program to promote the convention on
  • Idea forms should have been available all day; the rush to write down forms made my (and others') penmanship worse than usual (online advance submissions would have been cool too)
  • The program team should have sorted and grouped similar panel ideas before the "vote" to make it easier on voters and on the team themselves during collation/counting
  • Titles, descriptions and participants should have been listed on the "pocket program"
  • there should have been a participants roster where people could see if they were scheduled to present and when
In the end, though, the program was pretty good and there were no zero-audience panels. Consuite was a blast after.

Saturday morning I skipped out (more on this elsewhere). Saturday afternoon programming wasn't that interesting to me, so we hung out in hospitality more, and went back to Singlebarrel again for cocktails at 5. Afterward, we went to Maceio Brazilian Steakhouse for meat on swords, and were only an hour late for the Fannish Inquisition. FI is where Worldcons and Worldcon bids present in-person progress reports and answer questions. Some questions were great, some questions were pointless, some were repeats. Consuite was a blast after.

Sunday morning I had a 10am panel with Laurie Mann on using social media in your convention, it was well-attended (and live-tweeted). The 11am "Reno Open Committee Meeting" was less of a committee meeting and more of an extension of the Fannish Inquisition. There was little useful to me there, but since I'm on the committee I went.

We checked out of the hotel and checked luggage, and then did our 3pm party panel with Marah Searle-Kovacevic, Sandra Childress, Gary Blog and Sharon Sbarsky. It started out with more panelists than audience, but quickly collected people. All in all, it went well and we covered a lot of ground.

The post-mortem was at 4pm, we stayed for a bit, got sick of people making the same complaints about open-source programming and went home. We didn't stay for the dead dog party, because in many ways the whole convention was a dead dog party from the moment people walked in the door.

I'm not going to go out of my way to go back to SMOFcon, but if it's close again, I would enjoy attending.
bovil: (Default)
When I started this process, I set myself a goal. I was going to get back down to my "drivers license weight" (190, where I was 11 years ago when I moved to California).

I'm probably never going to see 200 again. I may never see 210 again (though I was close to 200 a few months ago).

And, you know what?

I'm OK with that. Hell, I'm pretty happy with that, actually.

Because, among other things, I'm back in 34" waist jeans (I think that's where I was back then) and, except when they're fresh from the wash, they're not overly-snug. If I get back down to an actual 34" waist (remember, clothing sizes lie. badly.) I'll be ecstatic. I don't really want to get below that, or my kilts will be too loose, they're 36" waist (and those sizes don't lie).

Because I can jog 6 miles in an hour and not feel like a dead man at the end.

Because I'm sleeping well.

Because I haven't had to change my eating habits drastically.

Because, like tropical glaciers, the chub is retreating. It's not gone, but there are places it's gone from. There's really not that much of it left.

I may not be where I planned to be. Where I am, though, is far closer to where I want to be.
bovil: (Default)
...or have any of you noticed Livejournal losing all of your entry tags?
bovil: (Default)
iKinook Reader #1 is coming along nicely, with a gorgeous cover by Mo Starkey and a hysterical article by Chris Garcia. I'm looking for more words and pictures for the debut issue, though (well, besides what I write myself).

I'm planning to release the first issue later this month at FenCon, so I need submissions by September 10.
bovil: (Default)
I think pingbacks are good. The implementation is sound. I want to know when someone is posting a link to my journal somewhere else in LJ. I would suggest turning it on. It's not a privacy violation engine.

I think the cross-post function is stupid and flawed. Stupid just in concept. Flawed because the implementation is crap. If I have repost turned off (and I do), I should not see the repost buttons on any LJ page (because I can't repost, I haven't put in FB or Twitter credentials). Neither should anyone else when commenting on my journal. If I have repost turned off (and I do), it should be off for all my LJ pages regardless of the settings of the person reading or commenting.
bovil: (Default)

Yes, I'm a bad editor. I've changed my specs. I've updated my cover template to be a bit larger.

updated template file updated template file
the new dimensions are 600x860 pixels. This should give a bit more room to work in without being too big for eBooks.
bovil: (Default)

I'm looking for a few good artists who would be willing to produce cover art for my new epub fanzine, iKinook Reader. Attached is a sample of the iKinook Reader cover typography as a PNG with transparency to be used as a design template. Art may fill the complete document page or not.

iKinook Reader cover template iKinook Reader cover template
Text template for the iKinook Reader cover. The final image size for the cover will be 396x594 pixels, and the cover design has to take the text location into account. Text will be colored black or white as appropriate to the background.
bovil: (Default)
normal transmissions will resume shorty.

Profile

bovil: (Default)
Andrew T Trembley

June 2011

S M T W T F S
    1 2 34
5 6 7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 03:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios