So there's this "discussion" going on...
Dec. 14th, 2007 06:23 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...on this list I joined mostly to get access to the files section. Yes,
gurdymonkey, that one.
It's a costume-related list, so it only took moments for Godwin's law to kick in and "authenticity nazis" and "costume nazis" to come up, and (not surprisingly) offend a bunch of folks because of the Nazi reference.
Mind you, I'm a big fan of Donna Barr's humorous and satirical Desert Peach stories. I'm totally with Mel Brooks in that ridicule is the best offense against real fascists and folks that think fascism is cool; they just can't take it. Even Hogan's Heroes with its hokey sit-com formula (pretty inappropriate in relation to the real horror of the Third Reich) has some merit in making laughing-stocks of the Nazis.
Back to the offensensitivity, though. You don't diminish the power of an image and a movement by restricting its name to hushed discussions that practically revere its horror. You also don't make any point well by engaging in hyperbole that equates emo personal drama with the worst horror of the 20th century.
The funny thing is, in the greater context, I do have a few historical costume pet peeves.
I hate bad footwear. Yeah, I wore bad footwear for quite a while, but I got over it. Tennish shoes? Trainers? Gack. Shoes are hard to make, but it's possible to get decent shoes without paying too much. They don't even have to be the right shoes, they just have to be something that doesn't stick out like a sore toe. Dreamshoes and faire boots may not be "right" but they blend better into the illusion. Modern zori (men's zori, at least) and geta may not be period, but they don't destroy the illusion (women's modern zori are a bit precious and over the top).
I hate missing headgear. Hats are an essential piece of clothing for many periods and cultures. Part of it comes from working faire. When I started, I could almost always identify other performers even if I didn't know them; they were the ones wearing hats. Nobody else bothered. Faire patrons who come in costume seem to have noticed this, and it's now common to see costumed patrons who have hats. The modern aversion to hats destroys the illusion for me.
Mind you, I'm not going to go running up to someone saying "these shoes suck."
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
It's a costume-related list, so it only took moments for Godwin's law to kick in and "authenticity nazis" and "costume nazis" to come up, and (not surprisingly) offend a bunch of folks because of the Nazi reference.
Mind you, I'm a big fan of Donna Barr's humorous and satirical Desert Peach stories. I'm totally with Mel Brooks in that ridicule is the best offense against real fascists and folks that think fascism is cool; they just can't take it. Even Hogan's Heroes with its hokey sit-com formula (pretty inappropriate in relation to the real horror of the Third Reich) has some merit in making laughing-stocks of the Nazis.
Back to the offensensitivity, though. You don't diminish the power of an image and a movement by restricting its name to hushed discussions that practically revere its horror. You also don't make any point well by engaging in hyperbole that equates emo personal drama with the worst horror of the 20th century.
The funny thing is, in the greater context, I do have a few historical costume pet peeves.
I hate bad footwear. Yeah, I wore bad footwear for quite a while, but I got over it. Tennish shoes? Trainers? Gack. Shoes are hard to make, but it's possible to get decent shoes without paying too much. They don't even have to be the right shoes, they just have to be something that doesn't stick out like a sore toe. Dreamshoes and faire boots may not be "right" but they blend better into the illusion. Modern zori (men's zori, at least) and geta may not be period, but they don't destroy the illusion (women's modern zori are a bit precious and over the top).
I hate missing headgear. Hats are an essential piece of clothing for many periods and cultures. Part of it comes from working faire. When I started, I could almost always identify other performers even if I didn't know them; they were the ones wearing hats. Nobody else bothered. Faire patrons who come in costume seem to have noticed this, and it's now common to see costumed patrons who have hats. The modern aversion to hats destroys the illusion for me.
Mind you, I'm not going to go running up to someone saying "these shoes suck."
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 03:32 am (UTC)For another, this occurred on a list that is generally the most civilized one I participate in. My initial reaction was "Who let these barbarians in here?"
So, what are you making your eboshi out of?
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 07:35 am (UTC)I haven't got enough brain cells for eboshi yet. I expect I'll make a half-assed attempt so I get done on time and then make better attempts as soon as I catch my breath.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 03:39 am (UTC)They always make me laugh when they can't explain their machine woven, machine sewn 11th century tunic, or whatever.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:09 am (UTC)I agree, there are some very obvious details that people tend to skip, just because in this modern day and age we skip them. If you can wear trainers to the office, why can't you wear them on the battlefield? Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-15 04:51 am (UTC)I reckon you can understand her annoyance when, in the only costume contest she ever entered at a convention, she was passed over for someone who had a flashier presentation but less accuracy, particularly in shoes. In fact, I don't know if I've ever seen another Sailor Jupiter get the shoes right, probably because the shoes are so deadly if done right.
(In case anyone wonders -- it's not the heels in Jupiter's kicky boots, so much as it it the narrow, pointy toes. Not good for people with wide feet, not at all.)
These shoes rock
Date: 2007-12-16 02:05 am (UTC)http://www.trocadero.com/dragondance/items/474826/item474826store.html
And how to walk in 'em: http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=IcbsVoyDb8U
(Fortunately for me, they're a couple hundred years out of my period....)
Re: These shoes rock
Date: 2007-12-16 09:19 am (UTC)Of course I'd be the nihonjin RuPaul, towering over the pretty girls...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 05:24 am (UTC)Of course, baseball games have the 7th inning stretch because of then President Taft standing up at one game he was attending many years ago and a new tradition emerged.
<== Mike ==>
no subject
Date: 2007-12-16 09:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-17 06:29 am (UTC)Thanks for the correction :-)
<== Mike ==>