Basically, he advances the argument that the "Yes On 8" proposition is invalid on its face as it is actually and _AMENDMENT_ to the state's constitution and not a revision. Thus it is illegal per the state's constitution.
Drop on over there and check out his arguments in support of this view.
It might take a while to hammer through the courts but at least it's something to pursue.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-11-05 10:32 pm (UTC)Well, my "No On 8" is amongst those three million absentee ballots.
Also, there's this to consider:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_11_02-2008_11_08.shtml#1225923130
Basically, he advances the argument that the "Yes On 8" proposition is invalid on its face as it is actually and _AMENDMENT_ to the state's constitution and not a revision. Thus it is illegal per the state's constitution.
Drop on over there and check out his arguments in support of this view.
It might take a while to hammer through the courts but at least it's something to pursue.
Madoc