Fiscal responsibility? Elitism?
Oct. 24th, 2008 11:57 amThe McCain/Palin campaign spent $150k of contributor dollars (or was that public financing dollars?) to spruce up Sarah Palin's wardrobe for the campaign.
$150,000. That's "pay off the mortgage" money for folks outside California. It's half our mortgage.
Palin's make-up artist is the highest-paid member of the McCain/Palin campaign staff, coming in at over $22k for the first two weeks of October.
$22,000. That's "replace a crappy old car" money with change left over.
I understand that Palin has to look good for the camera; it wouldn't do for a former beauty queen to repeat Nixon's mistake of 1960. This, though, is irresponsibility on a grand scale (by "little peoples'" standards). It's so far beyond John Edwards' $400 haircuts and Hilary Clinton's $3,000 beautician visits it's not funny, and it's all for less than 8 weeks of the end of the campaign.
Yet some people trust these candidates with their tax money.
$150,000. That's "pay off the mortgage" money for folks outside California. It's half our mortgage.
Palin's make-up artist is the highest-paid member of the McCain/Palin campaign staff, coming in at over $22k for the first two weeks of October.
$22,000. That's "replace a crappy old car" money with change left over.
I understand that Palin has to look good for the camera; it wouldn't do for a former beauty queen to repeat Nixon's mistake of 1960. This, though, is irresponsibility on a grand scale (by "little peoples'" standards). It's so far beyond John Edwards' $400 haircuts and Hilary Clinton's $3,000 beautician visits it's not funny, and it's all for less than 8 weeks of the end of the campaign.
Yet some people trust these candidates with their tax money.