Dec. 14th, 2005

Peanuts...

Dec. 14th, 2005 02:49 pm
bovil: (Default)
Yeah, I know, whatever you think of Charles Schultz, having Peanuts reruns take up space in the newspaper where some other strip being drawn by a living person could be bites.

However, it's worth checking out the new Fantagraphics The Complete Peanuts. The first four volumes (through 1958) are available.

Think about it.

Peanuts when the jokes were new. Peanuts when Schultz was still taking chances.

Peanuts when Snoopy was pretty much an ordinary dog, not Walter Mitty with a bulbous nose.

Charles Schultz was never a hack, even if he did fall back on formula after a few decades of doing his strip. Most syndicated comic artists fall back on formula much sooner (Jim Davis, anyone?).

But newspapers aren't running these strips, they're running 1970's reruns. I suppose they think starting over from the beginning would confuse too many people (and it probably would; many cast members are unfamiliar to current readers).

They're brilliant, though.

There's much more pre-school to these wise-beyond-their-years pre-schoolers. Snoopy is an ordinary dog, no thought balloons, and has a much more beagle-shaped nose.

I know you're not going to believe what follows, though.

They're surreal.

Not all of them, but many of them. Early Peanuts was much more subtle in its philosophical bent. That's not to say the jokes were more subtle. Early Peanuts was very absurd.

Most interesting, though, is watching the introduction of new characters, often very different from their current incarnations. Schroeder playing the piano before he could talk. Lucy, fuss-budget of the year, in footy pajamas and eating in a high-chair. Linus without a blanket. And, of course, Snoopy as an ordinary dog.

Can you tell I like the early Snoopy?

There are also the failures. Charlotte Braun, the frizzy-haired loudmouth (and visual model for the later and longer-lasting "Frida") didn't last a year, and for good reason.

I also love the characters that lasted, but eventually still disappeared. Patty (not "Pepperment Patty"), Shermy and Violet were early central characters who have faded into supporting roles or even disappeared. For years Patty and Violet's mud pies were a staple joke, but Patty isn't even present in later strips.

So the simple answer?

Buy it. At least the first two volumes.

Read it. At least the first two volumes.

Find out what the newspapers have been keeping from you for over 50 years.
bovil: (Default)
They're making me take down my Christmas stocking! I work for the state, and they're making me take down the Christmas stocking I have up in my cube!

It's an all-out war on Christmas!

Waaah!

Oh, wait.

They're making me box up everything in my office because we're remodeling and we've got to be out by the end of the week.

Move along, nothing to see here.
bovil: (Default)
On the way home from work tonight, I rode past Christmas in the Park, just like I have every night for the last two weeks.

I stopped at Safeway. I read price cards and fliers for Christmas Wrapping Paper and Gift Wrap for Christmas.

At the Starbucks next door (liberal Seattle hippie beatnik freak-o-corp), they were selling Christmas Blend Coffee.

At lunch, at the store, just about every where I've gone since before Thanksgiving, I've been hearing Christmas music. I was hearing Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas and The Christmas Song.

Could it be that I'm over-sensitive to Christmas stuff since I'm not Christian?

Could it be that I'm desensitized to Christmas since I'm not Christian?

Could it be that Bill O'Reilly is making this shit up?

Could it be that the religious folks who push Christmas, a major Christian holiday, as a universal secular holiday and Halloween, a major secular holiday and minor religious holiday as a Satanic threat are so deep in hypocrisy that they can't see what's really happening? If you really want to see a secular Christmas, take a look at how Christmas is celebrated in Japan. [livejournal.com profile] darrelx, you might like it, but I can bet that most of the "War on Christmas" crowd would hate it. Santa Claus, trees, consumerism, and not a Baby Jesus in sight.

And what's so wrong with "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" in the first place?

I guess for some people it's more offensive to suppose they might not be Christian than to assume that other people are Christian. I guess for some people it's offensive to think that axial tilt, pagan winter festivals and a bunch of rebel Jews with a miraculous lamp might be as much a reason for the season as Christ. I guess it's just the most current example of Those who call themselves “conservative” today aren’t happy unless people abide by their choices.

If this "War on Christmas" isn't taking place in the liberal stronghold of the Bay Area, I have to wonder where all these red-state conservatives are seeing it happen. I'm sure not seeing it happen. All I'm seeing is some megacorps deciding that "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" are more profitable to say. Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought profit is right up there with God and country in the triumvirate of conservative values.

Profile

bovil: (Default)
Andrew T Trembley

June 2011

S M T W T F S
    1 2 34
5 6 7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 27th, 2025 05:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios